In 1903, Ban
Johnson’s American League brought a team to New York City to compete directly
with the National League’s New York Giants for fans in the lucrative New York
City baseball market. The new team found
a home in the New York Giants’ backyard in upper Manhattan.
In its
earliest days, the team did not have a nickname; they were simply the “New
Yorks.” At the time, all teams were
frequently referred to by the plural of the town name, even when an alternate
nickname was available.
A firmer hold was taken on first place by the New Yorks in
the National League fight. The locals
defeated the Philadelphias, while the Pittsburgs were being thrashed by St.
Louis. Cincinnati managed to win another
game at Chicago’s expense and the Brooklyns were downed by Bostons.
The Morning Call (Paterson, New Jersey), April 29,
1903, page 3.
 |
Philadelphia Inquirer, April 28, 1903, page 10.
|
They were also
frequently referred to as the “New York Americans,” which distinguished them
from their National League neighbors, the Giants, who were frequently referred
to as the “New York Nationals.” Teams in
the other two-league cities of Boston and Philadelphia received similar
treatment. And when the city or team at
issue was understood in context, any one of those teams might simply be
referred to as “Americans” or “Nationals.”
 |
The Boston Globe, May 27, 1901, page 8. |
 |
The Boston Globe, May 20, 1901, page 8. |
 |
| The New York Times, April 12, 1903, page 16. |
Baseball
fans abhor a vacuum, so when a new team appears without a nickname, one or more
inevitably appear. But those nicknames
were not tested by focus groups, protected by intellectual property managers,
and promoted by a marketing department.
They were selected at the whim of fans or sportswriters, and appeared,
disappeared and reappeared as fan preference, editorial policy or circumstances
dictated. Teams could change nicknames
every few years or carry more than one nickname at a time.
In 1911, for
example, most of the teams in both leagues had multiple nicknames.
Boston, Hops and Rustlers; New York, Giants[i];
Philadelphia, Phillies; Pittsburg, Pirates, or Buccaneers[ii];
Cincinnati, Reds; St. Louis, Cardinals, or Cards[iii];
Chicago, Cubs; Brooklyn, Trolley Dodgers[iv],
or Bridegrooms. The above are the names
of the teams in the National League.
In the American League the nicknames are: Boston, Red Sox,
Speed Boys; New York, Highlanders, Kilties, and Yankees; Philadelphia,
Athletics, or White Elephants[v];
Washington, Senators, or Nationals; Cleveland, Naps, Naplanders, Indians, or
Blues[vi];
St. Louis, Browns; Chicago, White Sox; Detroit, Tigers.[vii]
The Washington Times (Washington DC), June 8, 1911, page
9.
Several
other widely used team names had come and gone within the previous decade or
two, including the Brooklyn Superbas, Chicago Colts[viii]
and Chicago Orphans,[ix]
St. Louis Perfectos,[x]
Boston Beaneaters and Philadelphia Quakers.
 |
Allentown Democrat (Allentown, Pennsylvania), April 18,
1911, page 6. |
Fans and
writers quickly suggested several nicknames for New York’s new American League team,[xi]
the two most prominent of which were the “Highlanders” and the “Yankees.” Two lesser nicknames, the “Invaders” and
“Porch Climbers,” referred to the new team invading or stealing the New York
Giants’ market share (“porch climber” was a slang term for a burglar). Other nicknames were variations on the theme
of “Highlanders;” “Kilties,” “Hilltoppers” and “Hillmen.”
Highlanders
The name
“Highlanders” resonated with the team in two ways, referring both the location
of their new stadium and the name of their President. The stadium was located on high ground in the
Washington Heights neighborhood of New York, and the President’s name, Joe Gordon,
called to mind the name of a renowned Scottish military regiment, the “Gordon
Highlanders.”
 |
New York Evening World, April 15, 1903, page 8. |
This initial
suggestion appears in what purports to be a conversation overheard at the
ballpark construction site, in which the decision to name them the
“Highlanders” was reached. But reads
more like an Oliver & Hardy comedy sketch, featuring a “Fat Fan” and an
“Elongated Enthusiast.” The “Elongated
Enthusiast” suggests the name “Islanders” for the team, because they overcame
National League opposition and found a stadium on Manhattan Island.
“Didn’t Brush do his best
to keep ‘em off Manhattan Island? And haven’t they grabbed their slice of
little old Manhat right under his nose? They’re the Islanders, sure.”
The “Fat
Fan” disagreed, countering with “Highlanders.”
“Highlanders is the name,” he said, with deep firmness. “Ain’t this pretty near the highest spot in
town? And ain’t Gordon the boss of the team? And isn’t there a world-beating
crowd across the pond that they call the Gordon Highlanders? There’s the name
for you – fits like the cover on a brand-new ball. That team’s going to be called the
Highlanders.”
A fight is
averted when interrupted by a man who had overheard them. The stranger guides them through a Socratic
dialogue of sorts that demonstrates the superiority of “Highlanders” as a
nickname.
“Excuse me, friends – just a minute – but what are you going
to call the people down there?”
He waved his hand toward the Polo Grounds far beneath
them. The Fat Fan and the Elongated
Enthusiast looked at him in commiseration.
They they gazed at each other and grinned.
“Why, said they in a breath, “they’re the Lowlanders!”
“Right,” said the third man.
“But I’ll tell you how to settle that other name. You fellows think Griffith’s men are going to
land near the top, don’t you?”
“Yep.”
Well, then, they’ll be the Highlanders.”
And the others agreed the name was likely to stick.
New York Evening World, April 15, 1903, page 8.[xii]
This comedy
routine does not appear to be the origin of the name. The name appeared without fanfare or
explanation in a report from spring training a week earlier.
Reports from Atlanta, Ga., where the Gordon Highlanders,
otherwise the New York American League team, are training, fail to tell of any
wonderful batting feats by Willie Keeler. . . . Harry Howell, the other
Brooklyn boy with the Highlanders, has shown up well and promises to be one of
Griffith’s mainstays in the box.
The Brooklyn Citizen, April 4, 1903, page 6.
Yankees
The meaning
of the name “Yankees” is more straightforward.
It was a variant of the more conventional name, “New York
Americans.” Since “Yankee” is a common
nickname for Americans, the “New York Yankees” was an appropriate substitution.
Name for the American
New Yorks.
To The Editor of The Sun -- Sir: If the new baseball team is
to have a name that is in keeping with the "Giants," does it not seem
reasonable that if they are the "New York Americans" they might be
called the "Yankees" or "Yanks"?
Patterson, N. J., May 4. Jersey Rooter.
The Sun (New York), May 7, 1903, pg. 8.[xiii]
“Highlanders”
was initially the dominant nickname, and remained so through the 1912 season. Other than the initial suggestion, there are
no known examples of “Yankees” in print during the 1903 season. But there is some indication that the name
may have been familiar to fans that season, as it appeared in print again even
before the following season began.
The earliest
known example was in a headline announcing the team’s departure from Spring
Training, in the New York Evening Journal
on April 7, 1904.[xiv]
One week
later, the name appeared in a report of a Sunday exhibition game at Ridgewood
Park, Brooklyn.[xv]
Ebbets evidently got worked up over the success of last
Sunday’s game at Ridgewood Park, where more than 12,000 spectators saw the
Yankees drub Ridgewood at 25 cents per score card.[xvi]
Pittsburgh Press, April 14, 1904, page 14.
Even before
opening day, the name “Yankees” was no longer confined to local fans or
newspapers. It appeared a continent away
in an article about the upcoming opening day games in the American League, and
quickly spread elsewhere across the country.
The Yankees will have, too, the biggest attraction in the
American League as their opponents. The
world’s champions, the famous Bostons, will hold forth in American League Park
. . . .
The Los Angeles Times, April 14, 1904, page 11.
The New York Americans have been dubbed the Yankees, the
youngsters even shortening on this by calling them Yanks.
Detroit Free Press, April 16, 1904, page 3.
Detroit Free Press, April 20, 1904, page 9.
An article
distributed to multiple outlets by the Newspaper Enterprise Association,
mentioned the name in a story about the Yankees’ manager, Clark Griffith.
Ban Johnson is said to be responsible for the placing of the
little fellow at the head of the New York American, variously dubbed
“Highlanders,” “Yankees,” etc.
Whoever
picked him out did a wise thing.
The Fort Wayne News (Fort Wayne, Indiana), April 21,
1904, page 8.
Highlander vs. Yankee
The use of
“Yankees” increased steadily and consistently, year-over-year, finally surpassing
the use of “Highlanders” in 1913. “Highlanders”
went into an abrupt, steady decline beginning in 1913, just as “Yankees” was
took the lead with a dramatic increase in 1913 over 1912.
 |
| Data compiled
from searches on Newspapers.com digital newspaper archive. |
The presumed
reason for the decline, as described years after the fact, is that it was either
a conscious editorial decision by influential local newspapers to use a name
with fewer letters, saving valuable headline and copy space in newspapers, or
the first year in which the team chose an “official” team nickname.[xvii] Neither one of these versions of events,
however, tells the whole story.
They did not
choose an “official” nickname that season.
The team owner and manager in 1913 disliked nicknames, any nickname,
preferring instead the generic “New Yorks.”
President Frank J. Farrell of the New York Americans may change the name of the club. He doesn't want the team called the Yankees, Highlanders, Kilties or Hillmen any more, but wants to tag on the title of the New Yorks only. The suggestion was made by Manaer Chance in a letter to Mr. Farrell yesterday.
Nicknames for baseball clubs and players usually come from
the fans or the newspapers, so when a name is attached to a club it is hard to
shake it off for a new title.
The New York Times, January 16, 1913, page 15.
In addition,
the claims that editors made the change to save valuable copy-space in
headlines and newspaper columns rings hollow. There were at least two other familiar
nicknames available that were no longer than “Yankees.” “Hillmen” and “Kilties”
each have only seven letters, and with multiple, narrow “i’s” and “l’s” in
each, they would have saved even more space.
And either one of those names would have retained the Scottish Highlands
theme, in a nod to what was still the more popular nickname by far even as late
as 1912.
All of the
various nicknames for the New York Americans survived for ten years, sharing space
in headlines and news copy, despite any differences in the lengths of the
various names. Nearly all newspapers regularly
used multiple nicknames interchangeably, sometimes in the same headline or same
paragraph, and sometimes choosing to use the longer name in the headline.
Yankees,
Highlanders and Kilties appear together in one headline. Altoona Tribune (Altoona, Pennsylvania), December 9, 1910, page 10.
In the meantime the Yankees have a rather tough row to hoe
out West. The Red Sox have less than a
full game’s advantage over the Kilties . . . .
If Jim Vaughn is right when the Highlanders hit the City of the Straits
Stallings should just about even the season’s account with the Tigers.
Yankees,
Highlanders and Kilties appear together in one paragraph of text. Bridgeport
Evening Farmer (Bridgeport, Connecticut), August 1, 1910, page 4.
Hillmen and
Yankees share space in the same headline.
New York Times, July 27, 1911,
page 9.
. . . In the sixth the Gloucester High School kid pulled Gardner's foul out of the Kilties' bench. Daniels and Hemphill each made three singles for the Hillmen, but none of their team-mates was able to drive them around.
Yankees,
Kilties and Hillmen appear in the same article.
The Morning Post (Camden, New
Jersey), September 13, 1911, page 4.
It’s not as
though newspaper editors suddenly realized the benefits of preserving column
space. Newspaper editors had been
shortening the space-hogging “White Stockings” and “Red Stockings” to “White
Sox” and “Red Sox” since at least as early as 1874, and “Dodgers” appeared in
place of “Trolley Dodgers” as early as 1898, and appeared with increasing
frequency throughout the first decade of the 1900s. Were the sophisticated editors of the big New
York newspapers asleep at the switch for ten years? It seems unlikely.
Perhaps
something else was going on. There is a
simpler for the sudden downhill slide of the “Highlanders” – they were
literally no longer highlanders.
The Yankees
name grew in popularity throughout the first decade of the team’s
existence. Even the team’s President, Joe
Gordon, whose name inspired the name “Highlanders,” referred to the team as the
“Yankees” as early as 1907, as revealed in a letter sent from Berlin while on a
European vacation during the middle of the baseball season.[xviii]
“It is difficult on this side keeping track of the standing
of the clubs in the big baseball race, and I have had to figure out my own
records from the daily scores I have gotten several days late. I hope to see the Yankees much higher up when
I get back to dear old New York.”
The New York Times, August 25, 1907, part 4, page 2.
If it seems
odd that a President of a professional baseball team would go on an extended
European vacation during the middle of a baseball season, his vacation may have
seemed odd to him too. When he left on
vacation, he was referred to as the “President” of the team. When they published his letter from Berlin
during the season, he was the “Vice President.”
And after his return home, Frank Farrell forced him out of office entirely,
without what Gordon believed to be a promised ownership position with the team
stemming from the original partnership agreement signed in 1903. Gordon spent years in a series of lawsuits
against Frank J. Farrell, trying to prove his claim, but without success.[xix]
With Joe
Gordon out of the picture, one of the two reasons for naming the team the “Highlanders”
in the first place was gone – they were no longer be “Gordon’s”
Highlanders. They still played in
Washington Heights, however, so the highland name was still geographically
appropriate. But things would change.
New Stadium – New Name
In 1913,
after a decade of playing at Hilltop Park in Washington Heights, they moved down
to the lowlands along the Harlem River to share the Polo Grounds with the New
York Giants.
Frank Chance may not succeed in rechristening the team which
he will manage this year the “New Yorks” but of necessity he has been rid of
some of the names which he calls meaningless and to which he objects.
The Yankees no longer can be called the “Higlanders” or the
“Hilltoppers,” for the simple reason that they have moved to the lowlands, under
the lee of Coogan’s Bluff, to play for one season on the Polo Grounds.
Montpelier Morning Journal (Montpelier, Vermont), January 30,
1913, page 6.
The writer
correctly predicted the demise of “Highlanders” but was wrong about how long
they would share the polo grounds. The
Yankees shared the Polo Grounds with the Giants for ten years, before moving to
Yankee Stadium, the “House that Ruth Built,” in the Bronx in 1923.
The Yankees’
quest for a new stadium in 1923, which pulled them out of Manhattan and into the
Bronx, recalled a similar search for their first stadium in 1903 that brought
them up to Washington Heights. That
search is as much a part of the history of the name “Highlanders” as President
Gordon’s last name, because if they had not ended up in the Heights, the name
may never have stuck.
If their
original plans had panned out, they would have ended up along the Harlem River,
south of the Polo Grounds, coincidentally on land owned by the same woman who
owned the land where the original Polo Grounds were built in 1880. Their search for a stadium was an odyssey
that pulled the team further and further uptown, and was frustrated by last-ditch
efforts by the New York Giants and others to force the team off Manhattan,
which might have kept them out of the league entirely.
The history
of the Scottish Gordon Highlanders Regiment also forms part of the background
for the name “Highlanders.” But there
were other “Gordon Highlanders” with closer and more recent ties to New York,
which might easily have been more familiar to New Yorkers than the Scottish
solders when the team first became known as “Gordon’s Highlanders.”
The Kilties, or Gordon Highlanders Band, performed in
Brooklyn in October 1902. Brooklyn Times Union, October 28, 1902,
page 7.
Ban Johnson
going further and further uptown to find new stadium grounds. Detroit
Free Press, March 13, 1903, page 10.
Movin’ on Up
The American
League emerged from the minor league Western League in 1900, as part of a
rebranding and growth effort by Ban Johnson and other Western League
owners. They achieved “major league”
status in 1901, but still hadn’t cracked into the lucrative New York City
market. Rumors of efforts to place a
second professional baseball team in New York City were as old as the American
League, but things became real in 1902.
As early as January, a report surfaced of attempts to make “Greater New
York a full-fledged member of the American League.”[xx]
In July of
that year, the Baltimore Orioles’ manager John McGraw left his team, jumped
ship from the American League to the National League, and became the manager of
the New York Giants, amid rumors that the Orioles would be ousted from the
league.
BASEBALL FIGHT EXPECTED.
Ban Johnson May Put an American
League Team in New York.
New York, July 8. – There is now every indication that this
city will become the storm centre next season in the fight between the National
and American Leagues. With the
withdrawal of McGraw from Baltimore to become manager of the New York club, it
is expected that Baltimore will be dropped from the American League and that
Ban Johnson will place a strong club in this city.
Reading Times (Reading, Pennsylvania), July 9,
1902, page 1.
The rumors came true, but without a place to play, the move
would be meaningless. The search for a
stadium became more difficult and dramatic than perhaps they first imagined,
with people connected to or loyal to the National League placing as many
roadblocks in the way as possible.
The new owner of the Giants, John T. Brush, for example,
gloated that, “the American league cannot possibly get grounds on Manhattan
Island, and I think they realize it would be folly for them to locate anywhere
else in Greater New York or vicinity.”[xxi]
Rumors of an agreement to place a new stadium in the Bronx first
surfaced in August.
Frank Farrell, the poolroom king, is
going to back an American League team in New York, according to the Sun’s
announcement. Arrangements have been
made with Ban Johnson and options have been secured on grounds in the
Bronx. These are even more accessible to
the mass of New Yorkers than the Polo Grounds, and are on the electric elevated
road.
The Buffalo Times, August 12, 1902, page 6.
The rumored location changed a month later, to a spot closer
to the Polo Grounds, which were located along the Harlem River at 155th
Street.
The latest announcement in regard to
the location of the grounds of the American League team in this city next
season is to the effect that they will be about two minutes’ ride beyond the
Polo Grounds. The American League
officials intend to get as close to the Polo Grounds as they possibly can.
The Evening World, September 6, 1902, page 4.
The stadium location still hadn’t been locked down in
February of 1903. But new reports suggested
they would play even further downtown, at the ball field used by the Manhattan
College Jaspers, and that landscaping work had already begun.
Rumor now places the location of the
New York American League grounds at Jasper Oval, 138th street and
Amsterdam avenue, Manhatten. The
property belongs to the city and is to be a part of Colonial Park. It is said that the property will not be
needed by the city for at least ten years, and that it will be leased to the
American League for that time. A new
diamond is being laid out, and a fence being erected around the grounds.
Brooklyn Times Union, February 2, 1903, page 8.
The next property named publically had familiar names
attached to it; names connected to the original Polo Grounds that had been
built at the northeast corner of Central Park in 1880 and abandoned in 1889; Mary
G. Pinkney, who owned the land the original Polo Grounds stood on, and August
Belmont, a member of the Manhattan Polo Club, and one of the men who had signed
the original lease to develop the empty lot into a place where he and his
friends could play polo.
In 1903, Mary G. Pinkney, now in her eighties, was still one
of the biggest, most active real estate owners and developers in New York City. August Belmont was now a part-owner and
member of the board of a subway company then in the process of expanding
service that would serve the planned stadium location bounded by 142nd
and 144th Streets, Lenox Avenue (now Malcolm X Boulevard) and the
Harlem River. August Belmont and the
“tunnel people” reportedly offered to broker the deal, even giving the team part
of the land for free. Ms. Pinkney leased
the team a large chunk of land, and her niece sold them another block
outright. The plans were scrapped due to
the meddling of another member of the board, Andrew Freedman.
Freedman may have had an axe to grind with the American
League. A few months earlier, he had
been the owner of the New York Giants in the rival league and may have felt
some residual loyalty to the National League.
A year earlier, while still the owner of the Giants, he reportedly sought
to purchase an American League franchise “with the intention of making Greater
New York a full-fledged member of the American League” himself, and may have
felt slighted at having been denied the opportunity. [xxii]
The grounds are located between 142d and 144th street and between Lenox avenue and the Harlem river.
All the property, with the exception
of about six lots was known as the Pinkney estate. The block between 142d street and 143d
streets was owned by Mrs. Curtis [(Mary Pinkney’s neice, Julia Watt)]. She sold it to the American League for a
figure said to be close to $175,000. For
a like amount nearly the whole block between 143d and 144th streets
was leased to Ban Johnson by the trustees of the Pinkney estate[xxiii]
for a term of years.
Johnson’s tardiness in naming the
location of the grounds has been due to his inability to secure a lease on the
six lots belonging to August Belmont and which are located on the northern side
of 143d street and along the Harlem river.
When they are secured, Johnson will tell where his grounds are. The pending negotiations will probably be
closed in a few days, or, at any rate, before the American League holds its
meeting in this city on February 24th.
Democrat and Chronicle (Rochester, New York), February 14,
1903, page 15.
So confident were they in the agreement that they
started work preparing the lot for a new stadium. Once again, however, their plans were moving
faster than the wheels of progress, and the wheels of progress ground to a halt
in the boardroom of the Interborough Railway Company.
President Johnson, of the American
league, is here, the purpose of his visit being the completion of the deal for
the new base ball club to be located in this city. Today he said: “. . . The strip of ground at
143rd street, owned by the tunnel people, was to be handed over to
us gratis. We submitted statements from
the Boston Elevated Railroad company and the Philadelphia Traction company,
showing the business we did in those cities, and we were informed that they
were entirely satisfactory; but just when we believed that the deal was closed,
and we had so announced it, there was a sudden change in the complexion of
affairs which made it impossible for us to secure the location. Why, we had even gone so far as to fill in
part of the river front at our own expense, so confident were we that our park
would be located there. We regret
exceedingly that we could not close this deal, as we would not have
disappointed Mr. Belmont and the other gentlemen interested with him in the
subway.”
Fort Wayne Daily News, February 7, 1903, page 7.
An anonymous informant directly involved in the negotiations
blamed Andrew Freedman.
“As long ago as last August,” said
the Sun’s informant, “Johnson, Somers, Kilfoyle and others received a direct
invitation to do business with the subway people here. A prominent real-estate man who has purchased
much of the property used for the tunnel connections made the direct
proposition to the American League men.
He told them the tunnel people wanted the American League grounds
located on the line of the subway and named the property bounded by 141st
street, 143d street, Lenox avenue and the harlem River as an available site. .
. .
“This source of revenue was readily
appreciated by the tunnel people, and the real-estate man was told to go ahead
with the deal. . . . The real-estate man took this proposition before the
tunnel people, who instantly approved of it and word was carried to Johnson
that he would not have to look further for grounds.
“It was because of this assurance
that Johnson made the announcement when he was here several weeks ago that the
American League had secured grounds on Manhattan Island, in fact, had purchased
half of the property, and had leased the other half . . . .
“But not long after this, at a
meeting of the directors of the company which is building the subway, John B.
McDonald brought up the deal with the American League for formal sanction.
“Andrew Freedman, one of the
directors, immediately threw cold water on it.
As the other directors knew nothing of baseball matters and naturally
took Freedman’s word, the deal with Johnson was turned down.
“I have it on the best of authority
that both John B. McDonald and August Belmont were in favor of allowing the
American League to take the property until Freedman expressed his views.”
The Buffalo Express, February 5, 1903, page 14.
Freedman’s sabotage of the 142d Street deal appears to have
been a last ditch effort to keep the American League out of the New York
market. A number of National League
owners reportedly tried to change their original agreement with the American
League, seeking to confine them to placing a team on Manhattan or nowhere at
all, which, if they could block them from finding a suitable large plot of
land, would have effectively barred them from entering the New York
market. Cooler heads prevailed, however,
and Ban Johnson was given assurances that he could locate the team anywhere in
Greater New York without violating their agreement.
Garry Hermann, president of the
Cincinnati Baseball Club, who is just now the leader of the National League,
has taken it upon himself to notify President Johnson of the American League
that the move undertaken by several National League magnates to confine the new
American club here to Manhattan Island by changing a clause in the peace
compact will not work and that Johnson & Co. are at liberty to place the
new club anywhere in Greater New York without fear of violating the agreement.
The Buffalo Express, February 5, 1903, page 14.
The right to place a team anywhere in “Greater New York”
resulted in another occasional nickname for the team. Instead of being referred to as simply the “New
Yorks,” they were occasionally referred to as the “Greater New Yorks.” In 1903, the city was five years removed from
the creation of the so-called “City of Greater New York,” through the annexation
of Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island in 1898.
The New York Giants and the Brooklyn Dodgers were both in existence long
before annexation, and neither one was ever seen as representing anyone but
people in their own, respective borough.
The new American League franchise, on the other hand, had the
opportunity to locate anywhere within Greater New York, and could lay claim to
representing the entire, recently consolidated city in the new league.
Ban Johnson announced the location of their new stadium in
the middle of March, barely six weeks before their home opener scheduled for
April 30th.
 |
Pittsburgh Press, March 15, 1903, page 19. |
New York American League baseball
club will play this year on grounds located between 165th Street on
the south, 168th Street on the north, 11th Avenue on the
east and Fort Washington Road on the west.
The property belongs to the New York Institute for the Blind, and has
been leased by the new club owners for a term of years.
Buffalo Courier, March 13, 1903, page 11.
The site of the new American League baseball grounds promises to be one of the
most picturesque and largest in the world when completed. It seems, however, that much work will have
to be done to get the grounds in shape for the opening game, scheduled for
April 30. The photograph, taken
yesterday, shows the work that will have to be done to clear and level the
ground.
Trees, some more than two feet in
circumference, dot the field at frequent intervals, and, besides, there is an
artificial lake that will have to be filled.
There will not be any carting needed, as the blasting from the huge
rocks and the waste from leveling can be used for filling in the low places.
New York Tribune, March 14, 1903, page 5.
Despite the obstacles, the stadium was ready for the home
opener on April 30, 1903.
 |
New York Tribune, May 1, 1903, page 5. |
Shakespeare, when he wrote “the cat
will mew and the dog will have his day,” was ignorant of the Deveryite Baseball
Club. The adage, however, certainly
applies to the way in which that club had its day yesterday. It was the opening of the club’s season on
the home grounds, and the local team won from Washington by a score of 6 to 2.
New York Tribune, May 1, 1903, page 5.
The stadium was ready, but the field was not. During their first six home games, much of
the outfield was roped off, and every ball hit into the “pit” (a twenty-foot
deep depression in right field) was a ground-rule double.
Yesterday the entire outfield had to
be roped in, owing to the right and center fields being many feet short of the
requisite distance. These fields ended a
short distance back of second and first bases in an abrupt decline, the bottom
of which was twenty feet or so below the level of the diamond. This made it necessary to have ground rules
making a hit into the “pit” only good for two bases.
The players of both teams aimed to
land the ball into this territory, as it was an utter impossibility for the
fielder to cover the hit. Many of them
succeeded, and several hits that netted two bases would have been “eaten up”
had the grounds been in proper shape.
This, of course, spoiled the game as a contest, and it was impossible to
arouse considerable enthusiasm in consequence.
Evening Star (District of Columbia), May 1, 1903,
page 9.
The Yankees and their opponents combined for 34 doubles in
their first six home games. The field
was filled and leveled before their return from their first extended road trip.
The New York Tribune’s
report of the home opener used yet another nickname that did not stand the test
of time – the “Deveryites,” for William Devery, one of the team’s silent
partners. Devery was a former Chief of
Police and Deputy Police Commissioner, and a Tammany Hall politician who
commanded a local political faction also known as the Deveryites.
The Tribune first
called them the “Deveryites” in reports of an earlier game played in Washington
DC, where politically savvy fans had picked up on the name.
Most of the “rooters” who were
present at to-day’s game between the New-York American League team and the home
players frequently referred to the visitors as the “Deveryites” and the “New-York’s
finest.” The references were due to the
exclusive announcement in to-day’s Tribune that Devery, the former Chief of the
New York Police Department, was reported to be the principal backer of the
visiting nine. The visitors really
earned the title of “New-York’s finest” by their easy victory of 7 to 2 over
the home players.
New York Tribune, April 24, 1903, page 5.
The nickname lasted no more than a week or two, and seems to
have been confined to the New York
Tribune.
The Deveryites had on their batting
clothes yesterday when they faced the Washington American nine at the American
League Park and won an easy victory by the score of 8 to 3.
New York Tribune, May 2, 1903, page 5.
Gordon
Highlanders
The Gordon
Highlanders are a Scottish infantry regiment, first organized by the Duke of
Gordon. In late-1777, there was talk in
Britain of raising an additional 32,000 for service in the Revolutionary
War. The planned units included a number
of Highland brigades, one to be led by a Colonel Gordon of Fyvie.
A new army and new commanders are now to be sent to
America. The militia are to be called
out in this kingdom. New corps are
already put upon the establishment; many others are in contemplation; and the
Scotch brigades are to be recalled from the service of the States of Holland.
The new troops talked of, as proposed to be raised
immediately, are the following, viz.
A battalion of Highlanders under Lord Macleod, consisting of
1000 . . .
The Duke of Argyle’s Highlanders – 1000 . . .
Duke of Athol’s Highlanders[xxiv]
– 1000
Col. Gordon’s Highlanders –
1000 . . .
Col. Dalrympe’s loyal Lowlanders – 1000
Midland Highlanders – 1000
Sutherland’s and Mackay’s Highlanders – 1000
The Earl of Seaforth’s Highlanders – 1000 . . . .
Jackson’s Oxford Journal (Oxford, England), December 27,
1777, page 3 (widely reprinted in
British and American newspapers).
Colonel
Gordon finished his recruiting in Aberdeen, marched his men to Greenock via
Sterling Castle and Glasgow, from which they shipped off to Ireland by the end
of May.[xxv]
The
Honorable Colonel William Gordon of Fyvie was a Member of Parliament, a career
army officer, and half-brother of George Gordon, the third Duke of Gordon.
William Gordon
of Fyvie’s “Gordon Highlanders” were ultimately disbanded, but the Marquis of
Huntly, the Duke of Gordon’s nephew, raised another regiment of “Gordon Highlanders”
in 1794.
It will be seen that three regiments were raised by the
influence of this family in the years 1759, 1779, and 1793. The last, being a Fencible corps, the Marquis
of Huntly [(the Duke’s nephew)], then a Captain in the 3d Foot Guards, offered
to raise a regiment for more extended service.
For this purpose he received Letters of Service on the 10th
of February 1794.
Sketches of the Character, Manners,
and Present State of the Highlanders of Scotland; with Details of the Military
Service of the Highland Regiments, Edinburgh, Constable, 1825, 3d Edition, Volume 2, page 289.
The Marquis
of Huntley’s corps has (in one form or another) carried the name “Gordon
Highlanders” for two centuries. They
were originally designated the 100th regiment, later renumbered as
the 92nd. They merged with
the 75th Regiment of Foot in 1881, becoming an unnumbered regiment
with the name “Gordon Highlanders” as its official designation. They merged with the “Queen’s Own
Highlanders” in 2006, losing the “Gordon,” and becoming simply the
“Highlanders.”
The Gordon
Highlanders would have been familiar to avid readers of New York newspapers in
1903, as they had received glowing reviews a few years earlier in coverage of
their exploits in the Boer Wars.
The Gordon Highlanders comprise the Seventy-fifth and
Ninety-second Regiments. . . . The
Ninety-second Regiment was raised in 1794 by the Marquis of Huntley, whose
beautiful mother, the Duchess of Gordon, assisted to recruit the regiment,
placing – when all other arguments failed – the bounty, a shilling, between her
lovely lips. An old son says that many a
stalwart Highlander “was bought and sold by a kiss.”
The New York World, October 23, 1899, page 2.
Lieutenant Colonel Downman, The Commander of the Gordon
Highlanders at Maegersfontein, Who Was Mortally Wounded.
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, December 14, 1899, page 1.
The Gordon
Highlanders were in the news again in March 1903, in the days and weeks before
New York’s new American League team was became “Gordon’s Highlanders” during
spring training, but this time for something less heroic.
 |
Leavenworth Times, March 25, 1903, page 1. |
Sir Hector Macdonald.
Following close upon the story of the serious charges made
against Sir Hector Archibald Macdonald, comes the report of his suicide at
Paris, while on his way to Ceylon, at the advice of Lord Roberts, to face the
courtmartial announced to have been ordered in his case.
These charges are only vaguely hinted at, but it is difficult
to believe that a man of Sir Hector’s caliber could be guilty of any
dishonorable conduct, and the feeling is rather that he is the victim of a
cabal, who have been angered at his success where others, who claim to be born
to greatness and distinction, failed.
Sir Hector was a self-made man, the son of a poor Scottish “crofter” . .
. .
Fate, or chance, cast his lot with the army, and from the
ranks of the famous Gordon Highlanders he rose to be one of the foremost
officers of the British army and one of the very few who really deserved the
name of leader.
The Brooklyn Standard Union, March 26, 1903, page 6.
Despite the
past glory and recent notoriety of the Gordan Highlanders, there were other “Gordan
Highlanders” that were perhaps more familiar to New Yorkers when they adopted
the name for their new baseball team.
The city of
Buffalo, New York was home to a military-style drill unit that styled itself
the “Buffalo Gordon Highlanders.”
Organized in 1893, the “Buffalo Gordon Highlanders” modeled themselves
after a military band out of Toronto Canada that performed under the name,
“Gordon Highlanders.”
Hope to be as good as the Gordon Highlanders from Toronto.
“It will be a source of special pride to the Scotchmen of this city to have a
Highland corps which will compare favorably with the stalwart Highland regiment
of Toronto in uniform and discipline if not in numbers.
The Buffalo Commercial, June 22, 1893, page 11.
The Gordon
Highlanders of Toronto were invited to play in New York City during
celebrations honoring Admiral Dewey’s accomplishments in the Spanish-American
War. They accepted the invitation, only
to be overruled by Major General Hutton, who commanded the Canadian Militia, on
the grounds that Great Britain still had friendly relations with Spain.[xxvi]
But they
would make up for missing that one opportunity, embarking on a succession of
bi-annual US tours beginning in 1900. The
Gordon Highlanders performed multiple times in New York City and Brooklyn.
 |
New York Times, November 2, 1902, page 8. |
In the
winter and throughout the spring of 1903, the Gordon Highlanders were on their
“sixth semi-annual series of engagements in the United States” which took it
“from Boston to San Francisco, lasting 25 weeks in all.”[xxvii]
 |
| St. Johnsbury Caledonian (Vermont), May 13, 1903, page 1. |
 |
Post-Crescent (Appleton, Wisconsin), January 2,
1903, page 2. |
 |
San Bernardino Times-Index (San Bernardino, California), March
17, 1903, page 1. |
They
traveled across the Upper Midwest, through the Northwest, and
down to California during the first few months of the year. In late-March, they traveled eastward through
Arizona and New Mexico. They were in
Tennessee when the New York Americans were playing in Atlanta, Georgia, at the
same time the earliest known example of “Highlanders” appeared in print.
The musical
Gordon Highlanders reached Brooklyn and New York City in May, a few weeks after
the baseball team who were already known as the New York Highlanders.
Bonnie Scotland owned and swayed last evening the Thirteenth
Regiment Armory at Jefferson and Sumner avenues. The “Kilties” band of the Twenty-second
Regiment, Gordon Highlanders, of Bellevue, Ontario, Canada, a name famous in
song and story, and a light of valor in history, were there, and in the
presence of 3,500 persons, many of whom were Scotch, or of Scotch descent,
carried out a most interesting programme.
Brooklyn Citizen, May 2, 1903, page 5.
Coincidentally,
and likely completely unrelated to the choice of name in 1903, the new baseball team was not the first group of people to be called the New
York Highlanders. Nor were they the first New York Highlanders to be considered Yankees. That honor belongs to militia units out of New York City in existence from at least as early as 1852.
Military Visit. – A company of New York Highlanders visited
Brooklyn yesterday on an excursion, and their costume attracted considerable
attention.
Brooklyn Evening Star, June 8, 1852, page 2.
And the 79th
New York Regiment of Highlanders, organized in 1859 and active during the Civil
War were frequently referred to as the “New York Highlanders.”
Their
uniforms were a far cry from pinstripes, but they were Americans – Northerners,
“Yankees.”
[xii]
The story appeared three days earlier in The
Chicago Tribune, which credited the story to The New York Press.
[xiv]
“How they Came to be Called the Yankees,” Brian Hoch, mlb.com, December 21,
2020. https://www.mlb.com/news/new-york-yankees-team-name-origin
(“Yet the first published reference to the upstart American League franchise as
the ‘Yankees’ occurred on April 7, 1904, when the New York Evening Journal
reported on a successful Spring Training camp under the headline: ‘YANKEES WILL
START HOME FROM SOUTH TODAY.’”).
[xv] The Plain Speaker (Hazelton,
Pennsylvania), April 11, 1904, page 2 (“The New York American league baseball
team defeated the Ridgewoods at Ridgewood park . . . winning by a score of 14
to 2.”).
[xvi]
The reference to Charlie Ebbets, the owner of the Brooklyn Trolley Dodgers,
being “worked up over the success” of the Yankees playing “at 25 cents per
score card” illuminates one of the quirks of playing baseball at the turn of
the 20th Century. Playing
baseball on Sunday was illegal in many jurisdictions. In New York State in 1904, it was legal to
play baseball on Sundays, which enabled working people to enjoy recreation on
what was for many their only day off, but it was illegal to charge admission. Many stadiums and teams evaded the law by offering
“free” admission but charging for scorecards, and making having a scorecard
mandatory for admission. The Yankees
played two exhibition games at Ridgewood Park in Brooklyn early that season,
but gave it up after police started arresting scorecard vendors at the
stadium. The Brooklyn Dodgers challenged
the ban when three players were arrested on the field during a Sunday game with
the Phillies. A judge lifted the ban in Brooklyn,
and they played several more Sunday games that year.
[xvii]
“How they Came to be Called the Yankees,” Brian Hoch, mlb.com, December 21,
2020. https://www.mlb.com/news/new-york-yankees-team-name-origin
(“Marty Appel’s excellent franchise history, ‘Pinstripe Empire,’ unearthed a
1922 issue of Baseball Magazine in which writer Fred Lieb reported:
‘[Highlanders] was awkward to put in newspaper
headlines. Finally, the sporting editor at one of the New York evening papers
exclaimed, ‘The hell with this Highlanders. I am going to call this team the
Yanks. That will fit into heads better.’’ A 1943 history of the franchise
credits sports editor Jim Price of the New York Press for being the first to
refer to the team as the Yankees.”).
[xix]
In testimony given in 1911, John T. Brush said that John Day, Joe Gordon and
Frank Farrell first approached him in the spring of 1902 about locating an
American League franchise in New York; Farrell had the money, Day and Gordon
would organize and manage the franchise.
Farrell testified that he sought assurances from, and received,
assurances from Brush that the other two would not receive an ownership
interest in the team. Day dropped out of
the partnership, and Farrell let Gordon run the team, receive all of the public
credit and advertising value associated with the position, but would not otherwise
have a stake in the team. Fall River
Globe (Fall River, Massachusetts), November 22, 1911, page 7.
[xx] The Courier-Journal (Louisville,
Kentucky), January 24, 1902, page 8 (“Andrew Freedman is also willing to invest
a few thousands of his surplus cash in the purchase of the Baltimore American
League franchise and players.”).
[xxi] Pittsburgh Press, November 17, 1902,
page 6.
[xxii]
The Courier-Journal (Louisville,
Kentucky), January 24, 1902, page 8 (“Andrew Freedman is also willing to invest
a few thousands of his surplus cash in the purchase of the Baltimore American
League franchise and players.”).
[xxiii]
The “trustees of the Pinkney estate” may be a misnomer. Property records reveal that Mary G. Pinkney
owned all of the so-called “Pinkney Estate” (previously the “Watt Estate”) in
her own name, and managed it at her own discretion.
[xxv] The Caledonian Mercury (Edinburgh),
February 18, 1778, page 3 (“We hear from Aberdeen, that the recruiting service
goes on there so successfully, that several of the officers of the 73d (Colonel
Gordon’s of Fyvie) have completed their number.”); Caledonian Mercury, April 22, 1778, page 3 (“On Wednesday and
Thursday last, the 73d regiment commanded by the Honorouble Colonel Gordon of
Fyvie, marched from hence for Sterling Castle.
The regiment was about 800 strong when they left Aberdeen, and the rest
of the corps are expected soon to join them.”); Caledonian Mercury, May 16, 1778, page 3 (“Monday and Tuesday, the
regiment of Highlanders, commanded by Colonel Gordon of Fyvie, arrived at
Glasgow, and proceeded for Greenock on Tuesday and Wednesday. They were to go on board the transports lying
at that place.”); Caledonian Mercury,
May 30, 1778, page 3 (“On Friday last, sailed from Greenock, the Boston
frigate, and eight transports, having on board the Duke of Athole and Colonel
Gordon’s regiments of Highlanders, for Ireland.”).
[xxvi]
The New York Sun, September 26, 1899,
page 2.
[xxvii]
Visalia Times-Delta (Visalia, California)
_New_York_State_Militia_(Boston_Public_Library).jpg){kind=link}