Thursday, October 15, 2020

An Elephant in Boots - a Well-Shod History of the Republican Elephant

 

The elephant has been a symbol of the Republican Party since at least 1874.  Credit for establishing the connection between elephants and Republicans generally goes to a political cartoon by Thomas Nast, published in Harper’s Weekly.

In the cartoon, wild animals stampede through the woods, scared by the braying of an ass (labeled the New York Herald) cloaked in a lion’s skin (labeled “Caesar”).  An Elephant representing the “Republican Vote” is about to stumble into the chasm of “southern claims chaos”; the Democratic Party, a fox, lies in wait beneath a bush at the edge of the chasm.  At the time, the Democratic-leaning Herald was engaged in fear-mongering about the specter that President Grant would seek an unprecedented third term in 1876, becoming a virtual “Caesar.”  The tactic was used during the off-year election of 1874 to scare Republican voters into voting for Democrats for the House and Senate, to avoid granting Grant Imperial powers. 


“The Third-Term Panic, ‘An Ass, having put on the Lion’s skin, roamed about in the Forest, and amused himself by frightening all the foolish Animals he met in his wanderings.’ – Shakespear or Bacon,” Harper’s Weekly, Volume 18, Number 932, November 7, 1874.

The subject matter of an animal stampede was borrowed from a fake-news hoax published in the Herald a few days earlier, about escaped animals from the zoo rampaging, menacing and eating citizens across the city – a forerunner of Orson Welles’ “War of the Worlds” radio scare more than half-a-century later.

Over the following months, Nast returned to the Republican-as-elephant metaphor time and again, helping cement the image of an elephant as representative of the Republican Party.  The second example suggested that the fear-mongering had succeeded.  The elephant had fallen into the trap, the wolves and vultures are closing in, and the New York Herald (in the familiar guise as an ass in a lion’s skin) and the Democratic Party (represented by a fox) look on from the upper right-hand corner.


“Caught in a Trap, the Third-Term Hoax,” Harper’s Weekly, November 21, 1874, page 960.

Nast never explained why he used the elephant to represent Republican voters, but twenty years later, a Republican Party publication credit him with establishing the symbol.

So it was accordingly done by Mr. Nast, and the elephant as the Republican vote was represented as one of the animals beginning to be frightened by the ass in the lion’s skin. . . .

The aptness of the idea, the peculiar fitness of the illustration, were at once recognized.  The Republican elephant had come to stay.  In the ensuing numbers of Harper’s and other papers Mr. Nast used it again and again; the elephant as the Republican vote in process of time developed into the elephant as the Republican party, and as typical of the party it has been used ever since, not only by its author, but by other and less original cartoonists.  Such is the origin of the Republican elephant, the representative and emblem of the G. O. P.

“The Elephant and the G. O. P.,” Nathaniel A. Elsberg, The Republican Magazine, Volume 1, Number 1, June 1892, page 64.

Despite the official vote of confidence, however, there are several earlier examples of Republican elephants, raising the question whether Nast created the symbol or borrowed it from a pre-existing tradition. 

In his 1968 book, The New Language of Politics, William Safire identified what he said were two earlier examples, one from an 1860 issue of a Republican publication called The Rail Splitter,[i] and another from Harper’s Weekly in 1872.  Other researchers have previously and independently identified two Civil War-era images of elephants celebrating Union military victories and Republican electoral successes in 1864.[ii]

Of the two examples noted by Safire, the one from 1872 appears to use the elephant as a symbol of the Republican Party.  The one from 1860of an elephant wearing boots, on the other hand, appears to be simply an advertisement for boots and shoes, coincidentally in a Republican publication. 

As for the two images from 1864, the Early Sports ‘n’ Pop-Culture History Blog believes they are the earliest known example of a decade of sustained, occasional use of boot-wearing elephants as symbolic of Republican political success in southeastern Pennsylvania, which began a full decade before Nast’s original Republican elephant cartoon in 1874. 

It is not clear whether Nast’s 1874 cartoon in Harper’s Weekly (or the early example from Harpers Weekly in 1872) were influenced by the southeastern Pennsylvania tradition of boot-wearing elephants in Republican politics or not, but circumstances suggest that it was possible, even if not direct connection has been uncovered. 

Nast’s choice of an elephant to represent the Republican Party may have been an independent artistic choice, but the existence of the earlier Republican elephants raises the question of whether he was influenced by an earlier tradition of Republican elephants.  Tantalizingly, the single example of a Republican elephant from 1872, noted by William Safire, also wears boots.

But it’s not really an elephant; it’s a false one, representing a false Republican.

 

Republican Elephant 1872

In 1872, a third-party called the “Liberal Republican Party” nominated Horace Greeley as its candidate for President.  Greeley, the publisher of the Democratic-leaning New York Herald, was also popular among Democrats.  To avoid splitting the vote in November among three parties, the Democrats nominated Greeley for President on the Democratic ticket as well.  The Democrats even went so far as to adopt the Liberal Republican Party platform, which supported equal rights for African-Americans, which was antithetical to traditional Democratic Party principles at the time.  They were trying as hard as they could to present themselves as representing policies palatable to traditional Republican voters.  But not everyone fell for the ruse.

A political cartoon in Harper’s Weekly in July, a couple weeks after the Democratic Convention, shows Greeley riding atop a false, stage-prop elephant.  The true Democratic nature of the beast is exposed by its costume, a Confederate Battle Flag, states’ rights, a boot labeled the Ku Klux Klan, a pant leg labeled as the New York Democratic political machine, Tammany Hall, and Democratic office-seekers crowing in from the Democratic Convention in Baltimore.  Nevertheless, Greeley defiantly defies anyone to say that the elephant isn’t a real, and by implication that he isn’t a real Republican, calling anyone who would say as much a liar.

“Whoever Says This Isn’t a Real Elephant is ‘A Liar!’”

Harper’s Weekly, Volume 16, Number 813, July 27, 1872, page 592.

 

Boot and Shoe Advertisement 1860

The other early image Safire identified is something of a red herring, as it does not directly connect the elephant with Republicans.  The image appeared in multiple issues of the pro-Lincoln campaign newspaper, the Rail Splitter, through its entire run of eighteen weekly issues published in Chicago during the 1860 presidential campaign season.[iii]  But the content of the image is not overtly political.  It is merely an advertisement for boots and shoes sold at Willett & Co..[iv]

https://elections.harpweek.com/1864/RS04.htm


If this were the only example of an elephant selling shoes, it might be reasonable to assume its use in a Republican publication might be an intentional nod to the target Republican audience.  But the image of an elephant wearing boots, carrying a banner and draped in a sash was not confined to Republican newspapers.  It was a popular stock advertising image used to sell boots and shoes in stores across the country over the course of many decades.

An anecdote about a young boy frightened by an “elephant in boots” in front of an unnamed boot and shoe store in Chicago nearly a decade later describes a similar image.

A Frightened Lad.

Yesterday, while a mother and son from the country, the boy about eight years of age, were passing by a boot and shoe store on Michigan avenue, at the door of which stands an elephant in boots, as a sign, the boy discovered the “animal,” and immediately commenced to scream in affright, and no moral suasion or resort to shakes on the part of the parent could induce him to pass by the object.  After several trials, he was taken across the street and thus got along.  It was the lad’s first experience in “seeing the elephant.”

Detroit Free Press, November 13, 1869, page 1.

Numerous other examples appeared in print over a long period of time and across a wide geographic area.  Here are a few.

Cedar Falls Gazette (Cedar Falls, Iowa), January 2, 1863, page 2.


Men’s whole stock kip boots at $4.00 per pair, at Sam. S. McGibbons & Co.,

Sign of the Elephant, Market Square.

St. Joseph Gazette (St. Joseph, Missouri), September 30, 1868, page 1.

 

The Music Hall drop curtain has been named by some wit uptown as the Bill Poster’s dream.  Three new pictures have been added since we last saw this curtain; one an elephant with rubber boots on its feet, a large-sized steer, and a Modoc Indian in full bloom.

Kingston Daily Freeman (Kingston, New York), September 12, 1873, page 3.

Orleans County Monitor (Barton, Vermont), March 16, 1874, page 2.



If you want to see an elephant with boots on look over our advertisements this week. C. F. Davis made the boots.

Orleans County Monitor (Barton, Vermont), March 16, 1874, page 3.

Decades later, a boot and shoe trade journal remembered the image as tried-and-true advertising gimmick.

And I like the old printed kind [of wrapping paper] with an elephant in boots on it and the little inscription, “I Get My Footwear at Laster & Fitem’s. It just suits me.”

Boot and Shoe Recorder (March 3, 1909, page 27).

The advantage of the image for advertising purposes is that it could be tailored to clients’ needs, with two blank sections (the banner and sash) to insert unique advertising copy of their choice. 

Boot and shoe stores were not the only ones who used the image.  The image appeared on novelty envelopes sold during the Civil War and on topical song lyric sheets sold during the war.  Although these examples related tangentially to politics, the usage was inconsistent, sometimes pro-Union (pro-Republican) or pro-Confederacy (pro-Democrat). 

Of three novelty lyrics sheets Early Sports ‘n’ Pop-Culture History Blog has seen, two are pro-Confederacy and one is pro-Union.

Anti-Union: “I Carry Along! The Despot’s Song!” (the “Despot” refers to Abraham Lincoln). Dated Baltimore, March 15, 1862. Library Company of Philadelphia.

 


Anti-Union: “Oh dear, what have we here? George B. McClellan, The Bold Engineer.”  Dated, Baltimore, October 15, 1861. Library Company of Philadelphia.

 

Pro-Union: “Cruelty to Our Union Prisoners While in Dixie’s Sunny Land.” Undated, Johnson, Song Publisher, 7 North Tenth St., Philadelphia. Library Company of Philadelphia.

Two novelty envelopes from the Civil War era were printed with pro-Union, and therefore pro-Republican, messages. 

Pro-Union novelty envelope, “The Northern Elephant, After Secession Rats. What Patrick Henry said in ’76, “Give me Liberty, or give me Death.” What Jeff. Davis says in ’61, “Give me Hog, Hominy and Slavery.” Library Company of Philadelphia.

 

Pro-Union novelty Envelope, “I Always Win. Winfield Scott. Jeff being unable to come to Washington to see the Elephant, Old Abe will take the Elephant to see Jeff.” Library Company of Philadelphia.

Similar elephant imagery was also used regularly and continuously in Republican newspapers, meetings and rallies, at least in southeastern Pennsylvania, from as early as 1864.  And the earliest known such usage was also accompanied by the same pig, suggesting that it could have been the same publisher.

 

Republican Elephants – S. E. Pennsylvania from 1864

A history of Berks County, Pennsylvania, published in 1886, described the use of Republican elephants in Reading, Pennsylvania during the election season of 1876.

The symbol of the Reading Times, in signalizing a political victory on the morning after an election, for many years, was the “elephant in boots” at the head of its columns; but the Democrats desired to show by a living cartoon that they had taken its elephant captive, and were going to carry it along in their triumphant march.” 

History of Berks County in Pennsylvania, Morton L. Montgomery, Philadelphia, Everts, Peck & Richards, 1886, page 486.

Although the excerpt refers to Republican elephants specific to the Reading Times newspaper, similar Republican elephant imagery can be found in at least two newspapers in two cities (Reading and Lancaster) and in reports of the activities of two Republican “Elephant Clubs,” on in Reading’s Fourth Ward and the other in Philadelphia’s Twentieth Ward.

 

          Father Abraham – Reading 1864

A boot-wearing elephant appeared at least twice[v] in the Republican weekly “campaign paper,” Father Abraham in Reading, Pennsylvania during the Presidential campaign season of 1864.  The earliest example appeared shortly after Admiral Farragut’s victory at the Battle of Mobile. 

The elephant carries a banner reading, “Clear the Track!” a recurring theme in Republican elephants in southeastern Pennsylvania.  The expression was a pro-Republican, political catch-phrase at the time, sometimes used in an expanded version, “Clear the track for the Union train!”[vi]  It may have been borrowed originally from the motto of the “Railroad Regiment” of Abraham Lincoln’s home state of Illinois.

With “clear the track” as its motto, the Railroad Regiment will win a substantial fame for itself and its projectors, of which the noble Prairie State will yet be proud.  We sincerely wish it God-Speed.

Chicago Tribune, August 15, 1862, page 4.

An elephant wearing boots celebrates Union military victories (“Mobile Surrenders to Farragut” and “Sheridan the Peace Commissioner”[vii]) and supports a pro-Union Republican candidate over a Democratic candidate for Congress (“Ancona Stock Down and Hiester Stock Up!”[viii]).  The pig in the “Sheridan Goes the Whole Hog” cartoon, immediately below the elephant, is identical to the one in the anti-Confederacy envelope discussed above.


Father Abraham (Reading, Pennsylvania), Volume 1, Number 9, 1864, page 2.

Ancona would win the election that year, despite Father Abraham lampooning him as a politician who kissed unwilling babies.

“Ancona’s Mode of Electioneering,” Father Abraham (Reading, Pennsylvania), Volume 1, Number 10, October 24, 1864, page 3.        

The second appearance of the elephant in Father Abraham differs slightly from the first, in that it faces the other direction and is not wearing boots.  It celebrates recent victories in state elections Pennsylvania, Indiana, Ohio and Maryland (state and local elections did not always coincide with the Presidential election in November).  “’Little Mac’ Off the Track” either encourages General George B. McClellan, the Democratic candidate for President to get off the track to make way for a Republican victory, or celebrates that he is off the track for election, in light of Democratic losses in recent state elections.

 


Father Abraham (Reading, Pennsylvania), Volume 1, Number 12, October 18, 1864, page 3.

 

Father Abraham was originally a “campaign paper,” with regular issues only during a campaign season.

The Father Abraham was started at Reading, as a Republican campaign paper, in July 1864, by E. H. Rauch & son, and continued during the campaign.  It was revived July 1, 1866, by E. H. Rauch and published during that campaign.  On the 29th of May, 1868, it was revived in Lancaster, as a campaign paper, by E. H. Rauch and Thos. B. Cochran, and continued as a permanent weekly, Nov. 20, 1868. 

J. I. Mombert, An Authentic History of Lancaster County, Lancaster, J. E. Barr & Co., 1869, page 483.

There are references to it in an advertisement for “bitters” in 1866, and a reference to mutual libel suits by and against the publisher of Father Abraham and the Reading Dispatch in 1867.

Capt. E. H. Rauch, so well known throughout the State, thus speaks of Mishler’s Bitters in his campaign paper, Father Abraham.

Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, Pennsylvania), July 27, 1866, page 3.

The editors of the Reading Dispatch are in trouble, being under bail on two charges of libel – one on complaint of a lawyer named Sassaman, and the other on complaint of E. H. Rauch, editor of the campaign paper Father Abraham.  The editors have also presented E. H. Rauch for libel.

Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, Pennsylvania), August 22, 1867, page 2.

Father Abraham appears to have shuttered its business by the end of 1867, but it wasn’t permanent.  The owner picked up his printing press and packed off to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, where he resumed publication in time for the Presidential election season of 1868.  Despite having the same name, he started in the new location with “Volume I, Number 1,” as though it were a different newspaper.

Despite the resetting of the identifying issue numbers, the “new” Father Abraham in Lancaster followed the same format and the same pro-Republican editorial bias as the one in Reading.  It also revived the Republican elephant, this time always in boots, and added some new poses.

 

          Father Abraham – Lancaster 1868

Father Abraham’s Republican elephant took the familiar form in its first appearance in Lancaster, celebrating early, state electoral success in Vermont.

Father Abraham (Lancaster, Pennsylvania), September 4, 1868, page 2.

The new image of the elephant also wore boots, but just two. It also carried an American flag and was apparently dancing to a tune scratched out by a Racoon on a fiddle (the Racoon was the mascot of the old Whig Party, which had been displaced by the Republican Party a decade earlier), celebrating the Republican candidate, Ulysses S. Grant’s, election to the Presidency.



Father Abraham (Lancaster, Pennsylvania), November 6, 1868, page 2. 

The elephant came out again the following autumn, and put his boots on in preparation for a Republican victory in local elections. 

Father Abraham (Lancaster, Pennsylvania), October 8, 1869, page 4.

He celebrated with his “Happy Family” when Republicans were swept into office in citywide elections in Lancaster a week later.


Father Abraham (Lancaster, Pennsylvania), October 15, 1869, page 2.

Father Abraham brought out the Republican elephant again to celebrate Grant’s reelection in 1872.

"And Ye Elephant Rejoiceth!" Father Abraham (Lancaster, Pennsylvania), November 8, 1872, page 2.

 

          Times and Dispatch – Reading 1872

The Republican elephant, it seems, had found a home in Lancaster, but the people of Reading hadn’t completely abandoned the symbol.  In February 1872, the Reading Times and Dispatch , celebrated Republican gains in local citywide elections by trotting out the familiar, old boot-and-shoe advertising elephant, once used to support Republican candidates by Father Abraham in Reading.


Reading Times and Dispatch (Reading, Pennsylvania), February 10, 1872, page 1.

The Republican “Tidal Wave” continued in November, when President Ulysses S. Grant won reelection, and again the Times’ Republican Elephant called for people to “Clear the Track!”

 

Reading Times and Dispatch, November 6, 1872, page 1.


The Reading Times’ elephant took the year off when the Republicans suffered losses in the off-year elections in 1874, but still merited a mention on November 4th, three days before Nast’s “original” Republican elephant cartoon appeared – apparently the Republican elephant had been scared away by cries of Caesarism.

Our Elephant in Winter Quarters.

The Times Elephant has been temporarily retired into winter quarters, boots, trunk and all.  His fourteen years’ travel from Maine to California, year in and year out, has made him just a little tired, though we can assure our Republican friends that he is not a bit weak in the knees.  He will be well cared for, so that when the great national exhibition comes off in 1876 he will “walk over the course” as majestically as ever.

Reading Times and Dispatch, November 4, 1874, page 1.

The article suggests that the “elephant” had been around for at least fourteen years, but it is unclear whether that is a reference to how long the image had been a symbol of Republicanism, or simply a reference to the beginnings of the Republican Party in 1860. 

The Times’ Republican elephant made a triumphant return in 1876, following Republican victories in statewide elections in Ohio.

Reading Times and Dispatch, October 12, 1876, page 1.

The returns were did not come in as quickly or definitively in the Presidential vote a month later.  In the immediate aftermath of the election, victory was uncertain.  The elephant remained out of the newspaper for several days, uncertain whether it could show its face. 

As crowds gathered around the Times and Dispatch newspaper offices for the latest returns, the elephant made several virtual appearances through the “magic” of a new technology, the “sciopticon,” a slideshow projection system used to project images on a large wall or screen.

Prof. Beard’s sciopticon entertainment was one of the most interesting and entertaining character.  It was generally admired and the pictures were greeted with deafening cheers.  They were read with ease at the extreme end of West Penn square by the aid of a night-glass.  Among the number were long-faced Democrats, the Times elephant pulling the Democrats in a boat up Salt River[ix]; the Times elephant tossing a Democratic rooster; a rooster[x] sickened from eating crow and another from too much buffalo.[xi]

Reading Times, November 10, 1876, page 1.

It reappeared, cautiously, in stages, after the Presidential election, as the outcome of the election became more certain with each passing day.  As initially reported, the results were still in doubt – “All Hinging Upon Florida” – some things never change.

 

Reading Times and Dispatch, November 10, 1876, page 1.


Reading Times and Dispatch, November 11, 1876, page 1.

 

Reading Times and Dispatch, November 14, 1876, page 1.

 

Reading Times and Dispatch, December 8, 1876, page 1.

 

The Reading Times still used its Republican elephants in 1896, when McKinley won the election.

Reading Times, November 4, 1896, page 1.


And continued using it in the new millennium.

Reading Times, February 1, 1901, page 1.

 

Elephant Club - Reading

The existence of Republican “Elephant Clubs” in at least Reading and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania suggest that the elephant, as symbol of the Republican party, may have been wider than it use in local newspapers in two smaller cities might otherwise suggest.

An “Elephant Club” existed in Reading, Pennsylvania as early as 1863, although the early reports appear to be simply advertisements for social functions, not obviously related to politics. 

A Rumor. – It is rumored that all the handsome young ladies (and they are all handsome) in this city, are to be at the party on Friday evening, at the Keystone Hall.  The “Elephant Club” are determined to make this an affair to be remembered.

Reading Times, January 14, 1863, page 2.

Reading Times, November 22, 1864, page 2.

The name of the club may have been borrowed by a popular satirical novel published in 1856, The History and Records of the Elephant Club, compiled from Authentic Documents now in possession of the Zoological Society by ME, Knight Russ Ockside, M. D. and Me, Q, K. Philander Doesticks, P. B, This being the veritable and veracious History of the Doings and Misdoings of the Members of The Elephant Club.”

The earliest reference to a Republican “Elephant Club” in Reading appeared a month before the Presidential election in 1872.  The casual reference to the “Republican elephant, boots and all,” is consistent with the longstanding, local Republican imagery in Reading.

REPUBLICAN TORCH LIGHT PROCESSION!

A Monster Demonstration

2500 MEN IN LINE

The City Ablaze with Torches

The Republican torch light procession of Saturday evening was the largest political demonstration that has taken place in this city during the present campaign. . . .

The following was the order of the procession: . . .

Fourth Ward Elephant Club, 40 equipped men.

This Club carried a handsome banner with the Republican elephant, boots and all, upon the front.

Reading Times, October 7, 1872, page 4.

Coincidentally, E. H. Rauch, the editor of Father Abraham, was active in Fourth Ward politics when he lived in Reading, suggesting a possible direct connection between the name of the Fourth Ward Elephant Club and early use of the image in Father Abraham.

Committee appointed circulate copy of resolutions that were adopted at the meeting of the citizens held in the Court House on Saturday evening September 30. . . .

4th Ward – E. H. Rauch . . . .

Reading Times, October 3, 1865, page 2.

 

Elephant Club - Philadelphia

The Republican Fourth Ward Elephant Club of Reading was not the only Republican “Elephant Club” in southeastern Pennsylvania.  In Philadelphia, the “Twentieth Ward Elephant Club” took part in Republican rallies and meetings from as early as 1866. 

The “Elephant Club,” which marched with the Twentieth Ward, were equipped in caps and capes, and had in their line the stuffed carcass of an elephant, which attracted great attention.

The Evening Telegraph (Philadelphia), October 6, 1866, page 2.

Twentieth Ward, Awake! The Union Republican citizens of the Twentieth Ward will assemble on Tuesday evening, October 2d, at 7 o’clock, at their Head-quarters, Girard Avenue and Alder Street, to join in the Torchlight Parade in the Ward, and then proceed to the Fourth Congressional Mass Meeting, to be held at Fourth and Parrish streets.

The “Boys in Blue” and the Elephant Club of the Ward are invited to take part in the parade. – By order of the Ward Executive Committee.

The Philadelphia Inquirer, October 2, 1866, page 7.

John W. Forney addressed the Elephant Club of the Twentieth Ward in 1871, explaining the use of the elephant as a symbol of the Republican Party.

The Elephants.

Address of Collector Forney Before the Elephant Club of the Twentieth Ward. 

Last evening the Elephant Club, of the Twentieth Ward, a strong Republican organization, held their usual meeting at the hall, S. E. corner of Twelfth street and Girard avenue. . . .  John W. Forney was called upon and delivered a very elaborate address upon the issues of the campaign. . . . Fellow-Citizens.  “What is the Elephant Club?” is a question constantly asked by those who read your stirring calls and the proceedings of your many meetings, but little reflection will convince the most skeptical that you have chosen a happy appellation.  The word “Elephant” means “a leader or chief,” and the massive animal it designates is distinguished for three great qualities, strength, courage and gratitude.  Perhaps no three words more expressively typify the characteristics of the great Republican party of America.

When the Rebellion broke out it found us enervated by slavery, enfeebled by treachery and mystified in doubt.  But the heart of the people soon beat responsive to the call of President Lincoln.  In a few months an army was organized from the ranks of the untrained masses.

Men of the Elephant Club, your name is therefore not only illustrative of your own appreciation of your duties as citizens, but it typifies the characteristics and the mission of the Republican party to which you belong.  What mean those victories by which we recover Democratic California, and redeem Democratic Wyoming and increase our force in Republican Main? What are they but so many expressions of our strength and courage?

The Philadelphia Inquirer, September 14, 1871, page 3.

 

Elephant Men

John W. Forney, who lectured the “Elephant Club” of Philadelphia’s Twentieth Ward on the meaning of the Republican elephant, had direct connections to local affairs in Lancaster and Philadelphia, and national political connections through his federal government experience in Washington DC.  It is not proven, but it is certainly possible, that Forney could have helped spread the use of the elephant as a symbol of Republicanism from Reading and Lancaster to Philadelphia, Washington DC and beyond.

Forney ran a newspaper in Lancaster, the Intelligencer and Journal, in the 1840s, before moving to Philadelphia where he published the Pennsylvanian, a Democratic newspaper.  Forney had been the publisher of the Lancaster Intelligencer and Journal in the 1840s, and later edited the Pennsylvanian in Philadelphia, before founding the Philadelphia Press and later the Washington DC Sunday Morning Chronicle (later converted to a daily).    

During the 1850s, he served in Washington DC as the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, when it was dominated by Democrats.  But he switched parties at the end of the decade, and served during the 1860s as the Secretary of the Senate, when it was dominated by pro-Union Republicans.  In 1871, the President Grant appointed him to serve as the Collector for the Port of Philadelphia.

John W. Forney, National Tribune (Washington DC), March 22, 1900, page 5.

John W. Forney is not the only person with political connections who could have helped created wider awareness and appreciation of the regional Republican elephant. 

Jakob Knabb owned the Reading Times and Dispatch after their merger in 1868, and remained in that position until his death in 1889.  He owned the paper when it first revived use of the Republican elephant in Reading in 1872.  Knabb was a delegate to the Republican National Convention in Chicago in 1860, where he might have seen an advertisement for Willet & Co. boots and shoes.  Years later, he was a Republican Elector in the Presidential election of 1876, casting his vote for Rutherford B. Hayes.  Abraham Lincoln appointed Knabb as the Postmaster in Reading, and he served in that capacity throughout Lincoln’s time in office.  

Jacob Knabb, Reading Times, July 19, 1928, page 6.

In 1872, an employee of Knabb’s at the Times and Dispatch, John S. Hamaker, left Lancaster and “went to New York and worked some of the large establishments,” [xii] the same year the first Republican elephant image ran in Harper’s Weekly.  Hamaker would be pure speculation, but his move to New York City is at least indicative of how plausible it is that the image could possibly have made its way to from a regional symbol to the big city, whether by his hands or otherwise.

John S. Hamaker, The Times (Philadelphia), May 7, 1893, page 22.

Edward Henry Rauch, owner and editor of the “campaign paper” Father Abraham in Reading and Lancaster, may have been the first person to use the boot-and-shoe advertising elephant as a symbol of Republican electoral success.  He started his career in public service, as a court clerk and Deputy Register of Wills in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. 

Rauch got his start in the newspaper business in Lancaster, “editing and managing two anti-slavery Whig papers – the Independent Whig and the Inland Daily,” under the tutelage of the “radical” Republican abolitionist, reformer and congressman, Thaddeus Stevens.  He later struck out on his own, at various times starting, buying, publishing and editing a string of newspapers throughout southeastern Pennsylvania.[xiii]

In 1859, E. H. Rauch became the “transcribing clerk of the State Legislature and in 1860-1862, chief clerk.”[xiv]  When the Civil War broke out, he joined the Union Army as a Captain, was wounded at Bull Run, and discharged in 1863.[xv] In 1864, he founded the “militant campaign sheet,”[xvi] Father Abraham, in Reading, which he revived again in Lancaster in 1868.

Edward Henry Rauch, The Times (Philadelphia), May 7, 1893, page 22.

Rauch was an expert handwriting imitator, and frequently appeared as a handwriting expert in court.  He is best known today as an early progenitor of writings in “Pennsylvania German,” a sort of pidgin German mixed with English, with unconventional spelling.  But his biggest contribution to pop-culture may be in helping establish the elephant as the lasting symbol of the Republican Party.

                                                                                             

Coincidence or Connection?

It’s not certain whether there was any direct connection between the local use of Republican elephant symbolism in southeastern Pennsylvania and Thomas Nast’s use of similar imagery in 1874. 

We may never know how or why Thomas Nast chose to represent Republican voters as an Elephant in 1874, and we may never know whether the Twentieth Ward Elephant Club of Philadelphia or the Fourth Ward Elephant Club of Reading played a role, but a political cartoon of a boot-wearing, Republican elephant from Philadelphia published in 1889 raises the possibility that someone may have been aware of, or assumed the existence of such a connection.

The cartoon appeared in the national humor magazine, Puck.  A bill poster in Quaker garb (a dead giveaway for Pennsylvania, which was founded by William Penn, a Quaker), rides atop a GOP elephant.  The elephant is covered in posted bills (advertisements), including several for Wannamaker’s, a large department store in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  The image is a reference to a political scandal involving John Wannamaker, the founder of Wannamaker’s Department store, who had just been appointed Postmaster General of the United States.

Waverly Gazette (Waverly, Kansas), April 6, 1889, page 3.


When the Republican President, Benjamin Harrison, appointed John Wannamaker Postmaster General of the United States, critics accused him of buying the office, in part through large advertising buys in influential newspapers.  The excessive number of crass advertising bills on the elephant brings to mind the advertising buys.  The elephant refers to the party accused of perpetuating the scheme.  The specific use of the stock advertising image of the boot-wearing elephant could also be an allusion to the advertising scandal. 

"Too Much Shop," Puck [1889].


To be fair, there were numerous other examples of Republican elephants before 1889, most of them not wearing boots.  But the question remains, however, whether the Puck’s use of the stock advertising image of a boot-wearing elephant in 1889 is a conscious nod to the early, southeastern Pennsylvania use of Republican elephant imagery or a happy coincidence.

 

 Legacy

Whether or not the bebooted elephant of the Reading Times is related to barefoot pachyderm in Harper’s Weekly, Thomas Nast seems to have popularized the Republican elephant, which has since become the official and permanent mascot of the Republican Party.  But the existence of the one prior (1872) example in Harper’s Weekly and the several earlier examples in southeastern Pennsylvania (from as early as 1864) raise the possibility that there was an known, pre-existing tradition of Republican elephants in southeastern Pennsylvania before Thomas Nast’s first use in 1874.

Surprisingly, perhaps, the stock image of an elephant wearing boots and carrying a banner is still available today, and available for purchase on stock image sites. 



It is even used on occasion in connection with Republican politics.



Some things never change.

Its use today is almost certainly because it is a cheap, readily available image, with no conscious awareness of its longstanding history as the first Republican elephant.  Perhaps this post will change that.

 



[i] Image viewable at HarpWeek.com (https://elections.harpweek.com/1864/RS04.htm), crediting Chicago Rail Splitter, June 23, 1860, page 4.

[ii] “Hurrah for the Gunboats!!!! The ELEPHANT is Coming! Clear the Track!” HarpWeek.com (https://elections.harpweek.com/1864/FA02.htm), crediting Father Abraham, September 22, 1864, page 2; “’Little Mac’ Off the Track! Victory, Victory!”  HarpWeek.com (https://elections.harpweek.com/1864/cartoon-1864-Medium.asp?UniqueID=4&Year=1864 ), crediting Father Abraham, October 18, 1864, page 3.

[iii] Charles Leib published eighteen weekly issues of the pro-Lincoln campaign newspaper, the Rail  Splitter, from June 23, 1860 through October 27, 1860. Six issues of the Rail Splitter are available for download and purchase at paperlessarchives.com.  A low-resolution preview is available on books.google.com.  The seller states that six issues are available, but it appears that there are only five, there being two identical copies of one of the issues.  One of the five issues appears to be a special issue, not numbered in the series, featuring cartoon images from earlier issues.  Of the four, unique numbered weekly issues for which previews are available on Google Books, every one of them features the Willet & Co. boot and shoe advertising image of an elephant wearing boots, including numbers 1 (June 23), 3 (July 7), 10 (August 25) and 18 (October 27).  

[v] Eleven of sixteen issues of Father Abraham are available online at archive.org, via a “curated grouping” of documents from LincolnCollection.org. The original documents are held by the Lincoln Financial Foundation Collection, Allen County Public Library, Fort Wayne, Indiana.

[vi] The Wyandot Pioneer (Upper Sandusky, Ohio), September 16, 1864, page 2.

[vii] “Peace Commissioner” was an ironic title used with reference to Union military leaders, whose military successes would eventually lead to peace.  A photographic print produced at about the same time, for example, shows seven “Peace Commissioners for 1865: Sheridan, Grant, Sherman, Porter, Lincoln, Farragut, and Thomas.” Library of Congress, https://loc.gov/pictures/resource/cwpb.07619/  

[viii] Sydenham Elnathan Ancona was the Democratic candidate for Congress from Berks County, Pennsylvania in 1864, and William Muehlenberg Hiester was a long-time Democrat who jumped ship to accept the pro-Union Republican candidacy in the same district that year. Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, Pennsylvania), September 1, 1864, page 2 (“Berks County Nominations. The Democratic Convention met at Reading on Tuesday last and nominated Hon. E. S. Ancona for re-election to Congress.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Muhlenberg_Hiester).

[ix] “Salt River” or “Salt Creek,” was the proverbial place political losers were banished by being “sent up Salt Creek,” a precursor to the now-more common “Sh—Creek,” where one might be banished without a paddle today.

[x] A rooster crowing was a longtime symbol of Democratic political success. https://www.newrivernotes.com/topical_books_1913_rooster_democratic_party_symbol.htm

[xi] The image of a rooster “eating too much buffalo” is apparently a reference to a large Democratic political rally and buffalo roast that took place about a week before the election.  The party is described in detail on page 486 of Morton L. Montgomery’s, The History of Berks County in Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Everts, Peck & Richards, 1886).  The party had featured a send-up of the Times’ “elephant in boots” being taken captive, with two men in an elephant costume rented from the Forepaugh circus.

[xii] The Times (Philadelphia), May 7, 1893, page 22.

[xiii] Pennsylvania-German Dialect Writings and their Writers; a paper prepared at the request of the Pennsylvania-German Society, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Press of the New Era Printing Company, 1918, page 75.                                

[xiv] Pennsylvania-German Dialect Writings and their Writers, page 75.

[xv] The Times (Philadelphia), May 7, 1893, page 22.

[xvi] Pennsylvania-German Dialect Writings and their Writers, page 75.

Tuesday, October 6, 2020

Politics and Peanuts - a case study in "Fake News"

 

"The Political Peanut Vender," Puck, Volume 36, Number 921, October 31, 1894, Cover Illustration.

Politics and Peanuts – a case study in “Fake News”

“Fake news” became a common byword during the Trump era, but “fake news” did not begin or end there.  While no one condones fake news (not even those who practice it), it is at least understandable that momentous issues of great importance generate conflicting characterizations depending on which side of the fence one sits.  One man’s “fake news” is another woman’s “alternative facts,” “Russian collusion” or “collusion hoax,” “Ukrainian quid pro quo” or “quid pro quo Joe.” 

“Fake news” is, however, less understandable when the stakes are lower, much lower – literally peanuts.  But that’s the way it was in the late-summer of 1929, even with the Stock Market already in a slide that would end in a crash a couple months later.  President Hoover’s peanut eating habits were in the news.  Depending on the source, he either ate them or he didn’t.  


Stefan Vasilakos, better known as “Steve” in Washington diplomatic circles when the diplomats are peanut hunting, has sold his goobers to five presidents of the United States during the twenty years he has held forth in front of the White House.

President Hoover, according to Steve, is the best buyer of all his presidential customers, which included Wilson, Harding, Taft and Roosevelt.  Hoover seldom passes the peanut stand without making a purchase, Steve says.

St. Louis Star, August 29, 1929, page 3.

Two weeks later, the same source was quoted as saying he didn’t eat peanuts.


Steve Vasilakos, whose cart has stood on the corner of East Executive avenue near the White House for the last twenty years, has catered to the peanut eating proclivities of Presidents Roosevelt, Taft, Wilson, Harding and Coolidge.  But Steve says President Hoover passes him completely.  “President Hoover is a nice-a man,” Steve said, “but he never buy a peanut.  He only come here in his auto.  I say ‘hello’ and he go on.”

Fort Worth Star-Telegram, September 5, 1929, page 4.

Conflicting accounts of Hoover’s peanut-eating proclivities were in the news again a month later when he attended game 5 of the World Series at Shibe Park in Philadelphia, where he witnessed the Athletics rally for 3 runs in the bottom of the 9th inning, including a two run homerun to tie the game, to clinch the World Series championship.

But, did he?

The News and Observer (Raleigh, North Carolina), October 15, 1929, page 1.

Or didn’t he?

The Boston Globe, October 15, 1929, page 25.


They couldn’t both be true – one of them was “fake news.” But why?

It may impossible to ferret out precisely what engendered the controversy.  But it may be related to the social status that peanuts and other snack foods like popcorn and hot dogs had at the time; they were on the one hand considered low on the social totem-pole, yet thought of as democratic, “of the people,” and quintessentially American.   

Sources hyping his peanut eating might have been trying to make him out to be relatable, a man of the people, a true American.   

Those casting doubt on his preference for peanuts may have been painting him as an un-American elitist, hopelessly out of tune with the American masses.  It's also possible that there was no good reason for any of it in the first place, just meaningless filler to sell more papers with no attention to the truth – cheap snackfood for the brain.  My how times have changed (?).

 

Peanuts

A brief news item about Senators eating peanuts on the Senate floor in 1931 may shed a light on the perceived social status of peanuts at the time.  Spectators in the peanut gallery were amused by the spectacle of two senators eating peanuts.

One of the most entertaining spectacles in a recent night session of the senate and one at which the gallery birds tittered, was that of Senator J. Hamilton Lewis, the immaculate Illinoisan, and Mrs. Hattie W. Caraway, senator from Arkansas, sitting together eating peanuts out of a paper bag.

The Dispatch (Moline, Illinois), December 23, 1931, page 1.

With respect to Herbert Hoover, the peanut issue arose almost immediately after clinching the nomination for President on the Republican on June 15, 1928.  The initial reports, as reportedly told to The New York World by Emma C. Barker, “a motherly-looking” woman who served lunch at his offices in the Commerce Department, made the issue more about his weight than his social status. 

By Leased Wire From The New York World. WASHINGTON, June 16. – Like William Howard Taft, Herbert Hoover is already worrying about his girth, and at the same time is passionately fond of peanuts, eathing them – bags full – at his daily luncheon.

The Charlotte Observer (Charlotte, North Carolina), June 17, 1928, page 12.

But the issue quickly turned to class or caste.  It wasn’t a strictly partisan issue; even political opponents came to the defense of peanuts, at least if they were the right kind of peanuts.

One of the editors of the N. Y. World is fussed because he learns “Bertie” Hoover eats peanuts for lunch, and would eat as many as the proverbial hellaphant were it not for his fear of becoming triple oversized.

This dept. will not vote, as the signs prevail at this writing, for Bertie, but it rises in defense of his love for peanuts . . . IF they are the in-the-shell kind.  For lunch peanuts are not such a torrid piece de resistance.  Bertie has been influenced by Barnum or maybe Hagenboeck.  Peanuts, to be kind to one’s innards, whould be consumed about 10 p. m. of a night when there’s positively nothing else to do.

At 10 p.m. I enjoy roaste4d peanuts. (Salted peanuts are a sort of fairy dish.) Roasted peanuts with unpatriotic Country Club or Pabst Blue Ribbon (haven’t you tasted that one yet?  Lordy me, but there’s a flavor that takes you back 12 years!) are swell.

Bertie hasn’t lost caste with me because he likes peanuts. Peanuts is good!

The Daily Times (Davenport, Iowa), July 6, 1928, page 3.

Despite that full-throated defense, it wasn’t clear whether he was politically out of the woods yet or not.

HOOVER AND PEANUTS

It is being told to the world that Hoover eats peanuts for lunch.  What effect this will have on the campaign, can’t be calculated at this time but this much can be said, namely, that of all known articles of food, the peanut tops them all for nutrition.  As an efficient person, Mr. Hoover would hardly be expected to resort to ice cream sodas and like trifles to satisfy his stomach requirements.  The latter not only cost more but they are not as healthful as plump, double-jointed, well roasted, Virginia peanuts.

The Berkshire Eagle (Pittsfield, Massachusetts), July 7, 1928, page 8.

Although most observers seemed to believe that peanuts were at least “American,” the feeling was not universal.

It is announced that Mr. Hoover “eats peanuts for lunch.” An excellent diet, even if its “fundamental Americanism” be questioned.

The Greenwood Commonwealth (Greenwood, Mississippi), July 10, 1928, page 4.

The Democratic-leaning New York World returned to the topic a few weeks after opening the can of peanuts, this time focusing on how Hoover’s enjoyment of peanuts had burst their bubble about his presumed high-falutin’ ways, based on his long career working and living oversees in Australia, China and London, after trying to paint him as being an untouchable, international aristocrat.

PEANUTS FOR THE ELEPHANT.

It was a bit of a blow to us, we must confess, to learn that Mr. Hoover eats peanuts for lunch.  It was all the more of a blow since we had indulge4d in considerable speculation about him in the last few months, in order to guess what he does eat, and had built up a highly romantic picture of him.  We had conceived him as having acquired all sorts of curious tastes in his wide travels; as having acquired a hankering for kangaroo meant in Australia and lichee nuts in China; as having been smitten with fresh beluga caviar in Russia and assorted hors d’oevres in Belium.  In short, when we imagined Mr. Hoover sitting down to his home table in Washington, we saw him surrounded with choice viands from all over the world.  We thought it possible that here at last we had found the international epicure.

And now to discover that he eats peanuts, not from necessity but from preference, and that his appetite for them is restrained only by concern over an ever-increasing waist line.  It is as though we found out that Jack Dempsey liked to knit.  Still, his weakness for this delicacy ought not to hurt him in the campaign.  If there is one thing that makes an elephant fat and strong it is peanuts. New York World.

The Daily Sentinel (Grand Junction, Colorado), July 16, 1928, page 4.

Hoover’s taste for peanuts was apparently not merely speculation.  He was caught in the act of eating peanuts while watching Babe Ruth go hitless in five at-bats in a baseball game a few weeks later.

The Daily Times (Davenport, Iowa), September 14, 1928, page 3.


Hoover was not the only candidate caught eating snack foods of questionable propriety that summer; Al Smith was seen eating hot dogs.

Well, now they’ve caught Al in the act of eating hot dogs.  Herbie has already struck for the peanut vote by letting it be known he eats ‘em alive and roasted.

The Daily Times (Davenport, Iowa), September 14, 1928, page 3.

After the election, with a peanut-eater headed to the White House, reporters sought the comments of peanut-vendor to the Presidents, Steve Vasilakos, who looked forward to doing land office business.

Rose days lie in wait for Steve right now, for Herbert Hoover, sixth presidential customer whom he will know, has already signified his interest in the goober, and during his Washington life has often stopped at Steve’s stand for his bag of fresh roasted peanuts. . . .

  “Wilson be very nice fella’ Harding he swell guy.  Taft, great old boy; Roosevelt, one mighty nice guy. Coolidge, all right, and this Hoover, say, he’s grand.  He eat three or four bags peanuts to once.”

“Washington Letter,” Allene Sumner, NEA Service Writer, Greenville Daily Advocate (Greenville, Ohio), January 7, 1929, page 6.                                      

Mrs. Hoover also proved her “thoroughly American” bona fides by driving her own car and eating peanuts with her husband at Opening Day for the Washington Sentators baseball team.

Herbert Hoover throws out the first ball on Opening Day, 1929.
 

There’s no doubt about it now.  Mrs. Lou Henry Hoover is thoroughly American and a thoroughly independent American.  Washington society began to suspect that a short time ago when the first lady of the land appeared driving her own car through the maze of traffic down Pennsylvania avenue without chauffeur or secret service bodyguard.  Those suspicions were borne out on the opening day of the baseball season in Washington when Mrs. Hoover, accompanying her president-husband who threw out the first ball, was seen to eat peanuts out of a bag just like anyone else.  Incidentally it was noted that it was not necessary for Mr. Hoover to explain the difference between home plate and a dinner plate.  There are no more positive signs of Americanism than to eat peanuts and drive one’s own car.

Battle Creek Enquirer (Battle Creek, Michigan), April 28, 1929, page 1.

It came as no surprise then, the following August, when widely circulated news items reported that the White House peanut vendor had named Hoover his best customer.  It may have come as a surprise a few weeks later, when widely circulated reports said exactly the opposite.  It must be true, because it was accompanied by a photograph.

  

The peanut-naysayers were proven wrong again during the World Series when President Hoover brought his own peanuts to game 5 in Philadelphia, peanuts he may well have purchased from Steve Vasilakos.


. . . if you don’t think we were all happy not to have to go back to Chicago, you’re crazy – but what was on my mind all the time was why President Hoover had to bring his own peanuts. . . .  Say, what do you suppose was the matter with Tom Shibe’s peanuts? I though peanuts were just peanuts anywhere.


 New York Daily News, October 15, 1929, page 50.

But that didn’t stop his critics from claiming otherwise.

President Fails to Eat a Peanut.

Furthermore, he at no time during the game ate a peanut.  This had been widely advertised as a part of his act, and by failing to come through the President missed a grand chance to go over big with the baseball world.

The Boston Globe, October 15, 1929, page 25.

A bigger event later that month, repercussions of which resonated throughout the following decade, may have pushed the peanut issue out of the headlines for the most part, although the Hoovers were spotted eating peanuts at at least one baseball game the following summer.

The Times Dispatch (Richmond, Virginia), July 31, 1930, page 10. July 1930.

The “Great Depression” may have pushed Hoover out of the White House after the next election, but even a worldwide depression couldn’t keep peanuts or peanut vendors out of the news; although someone tried having a peanut vendor removed from his White House beat not once, but twice – if it had happened four decades later, they would have named it Peanut-gate.

 

“Steve” Vasilakos

Greek-born Steve Vasilakos sold peanuts, popcorn and candy to seven presidents, from a pushcart outside the White House gates from the last year of Theodore Roosevelt’s administration until half-way through Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s third term.  His business first caught the eye of the press during a Red Cross fundraising drive in World War I.

Other contributions announced today are:

Steve Vasilakos, peanut vender near the White House, entire proceeds for one week, $24.

The Evening Star (Washington DC), August 15, 1917, page 16.

Photograph courtesy of the Library of Congress.

Some White House pickets may land in jail.  Not so Steve Vasilakos, peanut vendor.  Look at the sign he displays.  Steve’s battleground is anywhere between the treasurey, state, war and navy buildings, and he knows by name dozens of the government officials who patronize his stand.  He has already given nearly $100 to the Red Cross, and is still giving.

The Wichita Beacon, October 22, 1917, page 6.

He was still in business a decade later, despite what might be considered questionable hygiene by today’s standards.

Evening Star (Washington DC), November 2, 1926, page 2.

 

Even the pigeons raid his cart.  Steve Vasilakos, the peanuts and popcorn pushcart man, who frequents Executive avenue, lately victimized by squirrels, now has the hungry pigeons to worry about.  Steve really has cultivated their appetite for popcorn by feeding them, but it has gotten so now he can’t turn his back without the result shown here.

Evening Star (Washington DC), November 4, 1926, page 17.

Steve was back in the news in 1929, when he was asked about Hoover’s appetite for peanuts, and again six months later when he either said that Hoover was a good customer or didn’t eat peanuts at all.  Whether it was because of buying peanuts, or despite not buying peanuts, Vasilako touted Hoover for a win over Roosevelt in 1934.

The Monroe News-Star (Monroe, Louisiana), October 11, 1932, page 3.

When Calvin Coolidge died just before Franklin Roosevelt took office, they sought comments from Steve Vasilakos, who had served as an informal domestic policy advisor.  

In all the land over which he ruled there is probably no more sincere mourner for Calvin Coolidge than Steve Vasilakos, the peanut vendor whose stand is on the northe4ast corner of the White House grounds.

During the happy years of the Coolidge administration the Greek curb merchant may have played, unbeknown to himself, a notable role in the drama of nations – for he was the President’s “contact man” with the masses.  Every day when he was in Washington, Steve Vasilakos says, Calvin Coolidge used to stop by his stand and chat with him, maybe munching a few peanuts during the conversation.

Evening Star (Washington DC), January 6, 1933, page 7.

As he had for five previous Presidents, including one previous Roosevelt, Steve Vasilasko sold peanuts to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, or at least to his wife.


Beginning with hot buttered popcorn, bought from a sidewalk vendor, and ending at midnight when she boarded train for New York, Mr. Roosevelt yesterday showed the President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, how to get a lot of results in a limited time.  She was celebrating her forty-ninth birthday.

St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 12, 1933, page 3.

Reports on how Eleanor Roosevelt’s peanut purchase made it into the news may explain how a sidewalk peanut vendor had kept his name in the news for so many years – he planted it there.

 One of Washington’s snappiest press releases was issued the other day by Steve Vasilakos, who for 28 years has been running a popcorn and peanut stand on one of the White House corners.  Steve took a lead pencil and a brown popcorn bag in hand and inscribed the following:

“Was certainly a great pleasure for me to wait on the new customer today at noon.  The first lady of the land stopped by my stand and purchased a bag of fresh roasted popcorn for pastime while she was walking with another fine lady and with one of her favorite dogs.”

Steve was so alive to the significance of the situation that he immediately closed up his stand – though it was a find day and business was good – and dashed over the office of the Washington News with the story.

El Paso Herald-Post (El Paso, Texas), October 24, 1933, page 4.

Cultivating those relationships and keeping a high public profile paid off a few months later when the chamber of commerce tried to have him removed from his Executive Avenue location.

Steve Vasilakos, who has been selling peanuts and popcorn at a front corner of the White House grounds for 20 years, vigorously is fighting a move to get him off that corner.

A local chamber of commerce committee, interested in traffic, voted to recommend Steve’s removal from Executive Avenue.  Steve, who hailed from California, promises to enlist Senator McAdoo. “This chambair think I go joost cause he say poosh?” he says. “Nevair!”

The Daily Tribune (Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin), January 16, 1934, page 1.

The Columbus Telegram (Columbus, Nebraska), January 17, 1934, page 3.

 

SPARED BY PRESIDENTIAL INTERVENTION:

Vasilakos, peanut vendor outside the White House grounds for the last 29 years, who retains his post following President Roosevelt’s request to the police that they rescind an order for him to remove his stand.

The Brooklyn Citizen, January 22, 1934, page 12.


 Mrs. Roosevelt, who stopped once to buy a bag of peanuts from Steve, and who greets him gaily when she passes his corner, had heard about Steve’s plight.  And she sent to White House Secretary Early a clipping about it, with this notation: “Must this man go? E. R.”

Pensacola News Journal (Pensacola, Florida), February 2, 1934, page 7.

But even a popular President and First Lady couldn’t put an end to the controversy.  Complaints of special treatment and favoritism followed in the wake of the Presidential peanut pardon.

 

The nation’s capital is in the throes of a “peanut war.”

Its participants are trying to make out it isn’t a fight at all, but there are too many practiced “official observers” in Washington to let a thing like this go by pacifically.

The conflict seems to have started over the popularity of one Steve Vasilakos with the “First Family of the Land.”

About two months ago an executive order told the Fine Arts commission here that Steve could and would stay on “his corner” just outside the White House grounds, where he has vended peanuts to the families and staffs of who knows how many Presidents.  The commission wanted to remove his stand as an eyesore, but Mrs. Roosevelt read about it in the newspapers, and asked her husband for the decree.

There is a law in the district that peanut venders cannot vend peanuts on Sunday.  But Steve, “friend of the President,” vends to his heart’s content.

Another “knight of the roaster whistle” wrote Mrs. Mary T. Norton, chairman of the House district committee, asking that the privilege be extended, and pointed to Steve as an example of “favoritism.”

. . .

The Greenville News (Greenville, South Carolina), May 17, 1934, page 14.

The storm may have passed, but memories are long, and revenge is a dish best served cold - not hot roasted.  

Two years later, Mrs. Roosevelt had to intercede on his behalf again, following his arrest for obstructing traffic.  This time, however, she couldn’t save his entire sales territory along Executive Avenue.  But she did save his business, giving him a permanent spot right at the White House gates.

The right of Steve Vasilakos to sell peanuts near the White House was upheld today when Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt offered him a stand at the very gates of the President’s mansion.

Complaining that Steve’s peanut stand interfered with traffic, police early this week arrested him.  Today, it was learned, Mrs. Roosevelt asked the White House staff to write district police executives that she would “miss him at the corner” and suggesting, “we had better let him stand at the White House gates.”

Police said Steve would be let alone henceforth.

The Atlanta Constitution, September 24, 1936, page 2.

Steve Vasilakos was not content to limit his political activities to advising mere Presidents, he also consulted with Kings – well, at least one King, at least once.  When King George II of Greece visited Washington DC during the height of World War II, Steve rang the doorbell at the Blair House and introduced himself to the King.

King George II of Greece and the little American business man who is closest to President Roosevelt had a private chat today and the visiting monarch got a report that in “dis country, tings is coming right along.”

His majesty’s informant was Steve Vasilakos, the Greek-born vender who had sold peanuts and pop-corn from his small stand beside the White House for 32 years.

Steve is a naturalized citizen now, but he is very proud of the fight the folks in the old country put up against the Axis invaders.

Daily Press (Newport News, Virginia), June 16, 1942, page 6.

Other prominent customers who visited his cart before his death included the financier and Presidential advisor, Bernard Baruch, and the Soviet Union Foreign Minister V. M. Molotov, namesake of the Molotov “cocktail.”

Steve Vasilaskos passed away less than a year later, in February 1943.  He reportedly died penniless, in part because he donated much of his profits in his final days to Greek war relief.  He also sold War Bonds to raise money for the United States’ war effort.  

He had sold peanuts and, more recently, War Bonds from a little cart on a corner near the White House since the days of President Theodore Roosevelt. . . .

Steve was credited with selling $50,000 worth of War Bonds . . . . Speaker Sam Rayburn of Texas was his first bond customer and received Steve’s sales-resistance-breaker-downer – a free bag of peanuts.

 Pittsburgh Press, March 1, 1943, page 9.

With Steve’s passing, peanuts wouldn’t play as large in politics for another thirty-three years, when a peanut farmer, Jimmy Carter, sought and won the Presidency.  If Vasilakos had lasted that long, he could have purchased them from Jimmy wholesale and sold them back to him retail.  It may not have been much of a profit margin, but it wouldn’t have been “peanuts.”